Return-Path: <samepst@cs.bu.edu> X-Spam-HitLevel: X-Spam-DCC: INFN-TO: cs3.bu.edu 1233; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on cs3.bu.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Pyzor: Received: from csa3.bu.edu (csa3 [128.197.12.5]) by cs3.bu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9GIpiR3007940 for <cs520@cs.bu.edu>; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:51:44 -0400 Received: (from apache@localhost) by csa3.bu.edu (8.13.6/8.12.11/Submit) id k9GIpis0030943; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:51:44 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: csa3.bu.edu: apache set sender to samepst@cs.bu.edu using -f Received: from 71.192.166.44 (SquirrelMail authenticated user samepst) by cs-squirrelmail.bu.edu with HTTP; Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:51:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2417.71.192.166.44.1161024704.squirrel@cs-squirrelmail.bu.edu> Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:51:44 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Problem Set 6 problem 4 From: samepst@cs.bu.edu To: cs520@cs.bu.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6-4.fc2.1.legacy Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Clamav-Status: No Status: RO X-Status: A Content-Length: 360 X-UID: 20 X-Keywords: NonJunk
What language can be used to implement the new extendtable, in regards to
problem set 6 problem 4? Or in other words are there language constructs
that we have learned about, but are not allowed to use in this
implementation? Is it required that a table be of type Nat->OptionalNat,
and extendtable be of type Table->Nat->Nat->Table?
Thank You,
-Sam Epstein
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 14 2006 - 16:31:59 EST