Return-Path: <danben@cs.bu.edu> Received: from csa.bu.edu (csa [128.197.12.3]) by cs3.bu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iA6MInqj006790; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 17:18:49 -0500 Received: from localhost (danben@localhost) by csa.bu.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id iA6MInE04911; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 17:18:49 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: csa.bu.edu: danben owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 17:18:49 -0500 (EST) From: Dan Benjamin <danben@cs.bu.edu> X-Sender: danben@csa.bu.edu To: Yarom Gabay <yarom@cs.bu.edu> cc: cs520@cs.bu.edu Subject: Re: cs-520 Problem Set 8 In-Reply-To: <005c01c4c448$1723ad40$0200a8c0@YaromAtHome> Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.20.0411061718001.4711-100000@csa.bu.edu> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-HitLevel: X-Spam-DCC: Misty: cs3.bu.edu 1170; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on cs3.bu.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. Status: RO X-Mozilla-Status: 8011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-UIDL: 411f69ec00001bdd
I just logged in to ask the exact same question when I received this
e-mail. Essentially, I think it would be helpful if we had some sort of
guideline on how dissimilar our solution must be from Pierce's.
Dan
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Yarom Gabay wrote:
> Prof. Kfoury,
>
> A question concerning problem-1 (ex 18.13.1) on problem set 8. I am trying to think what's concidered a different solution. I have another solution but it uses side effects as well (also extends the internal representation) , is that the same solution? Do we suppose to find a solution with no side effects?
>
> Thank you,
> Yarom.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 19 2004 - 17:00:43 EST