Return-Path: <kfoury@cs.bu.edu> Received: from cs.bu.edu (cs [128.197.12.2]) by cs3.bu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iA7EbeCi006532; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 09:37:40 -0500 Received: from cs.bu.edu (kfoury@dip16-ppp-177.bu.edu [168.122.16.177]) (authenticated bits=0) by cs.bu.edu (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id iA7EbcAM020514; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 09:37:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <418D9F6D.8070507@cs.bu.edu> Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 23:07:09 -0500 From: Assaf Kfoury <kfoury@cs.bu.edu> Organization: Boston University User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 Debian/1.6-5 X-Accept-Language: en To: Dan Benjamin <danben@cs.bu.edu> CC: Yarom Gabay <yarom@cs.bu.edu>, cs520@cs.bu.edu Subject: Re: cs-520 Problem Set 8 References: <Pine.SOL.4.20.0411061718001.4711-100000@csa.bu.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.20.0411061718001.4711-100000@csa.bu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-HitLevel: X-Spam-DCC: dcc.uncw.edu: cs3.bu.edu 1201; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on cs3.bu.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=10.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. Status: RO X-Mozilla-Status: 8011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-UIDL: 411f69ec00001c15
Your solution can use side-effects. I do not know if there is a solution
without side-effects. My guess is that it is not possible, and if you
think otherwise, I will be very much interested to see what you produce.
Assaf
Dan Benjamin wrote:
>I just logged in to ask the exact same question when I received this
>e-mail. Essentially, I think it would be helpful if we had some sort of
>guideline on how dissimilar our solution must be from Pierce's.
>
>Dan
>
>On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Yarom Gabay wrote:
>
>
>
>>Prof. Kfoury,
>>
>>A question concerning problem-1 (ex 18.13.1) on problem set 8. I am trying to think what's concidered a different solution. I have another solution but it uses side effects as well (also extends the internal representation) , is that the same solution? Do we suppose to find a solution with no side effects?
>>
>>Thank you,
>>Yarom.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 19 2004 - 17:00:43 EST