Return-Path: <yarom@cs.bu.edu> Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by cs3.bu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iA7EivHq007871 for <cs520@cs.bu.edu>; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 09:44:57 -0500 Received: from yaromathome (h00095b97ac29.ne.client2.attbi.com[24.34.23.35]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <20041107144457012009ptqre> (Authid: yaelyarom); Sun, 7 Nov 2004 14:44:57 +0000 Message-ID: <000c01c4c4d8$581e7e70$0200a8c0@YaromAtHome> From: "Yarom Gabay" <yarom@cs.bu.edu> To: <cs520@cs.bu.edu> References: <Pine.SOL.4.20.0411061718001.4711-100000@csa.bu.edu> <418D9F6D.8070507@cs.bu.edu> Subject: Re: cs-520 Problem Set 8 Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 09:44:54 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-HitLevel: X-Spam-DCC: dcc.uncw.edu: cs3.bu.edu 1201; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on cs3.bu.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. Status: RO X-Mozilla-Status: 8011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-UIDL: 411f69ec00001c16
No I don't have a solution without side effect.
Thank you,
Yarom.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Assaf Kfoury" <kfoury@cs.bu.edu>
To: "Dan Benjamin" <danben@cs.bu.edu>
Cc: "Yarom Gabay" <yarom@cs.bu.edu>; <cs520@cs.bu.edu>
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 11:07 PM
Subject: Re: cs-520 Problem Set 8
> Your solution can use side-effects. I do not know if there is a solution
> without side-effects. My guess is that it is not possible, and if you
> think otherwise, I will be very much interested to see what you produce.
>
> Assaf
>
> Dan Benjamin wrote:
>
>>I just logged in to ask the exact same question when I received this
>>e-mail. Essentially, I think it would be helpful if we had some sort of
>>guideline on how dissimilar our solution must be from Pierce's.
>>
>>Dan
>>
>>On Sat, 6 Nov 2004, Yarom Gabay wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Prof. Kfoury,
>>>
>>>A question concerning problem-1 (ex 18.13.1) on problem set 8. I am
>>>trying to think what's concidered a different solution. I have another
>>>solution but it uses side effects as well (also extends the internal
>>>representation) , is that the same solution? Do we suppose to find a
>>>solution with no side effects?
>>>
>>>Thank you,
>>>Yarom.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 19 2004 - 17:00:43 EST